Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34876 (CHH)

CHANDRAKANT PRASAD v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/4345/2022 · 2025-01-09

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:1438 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4345 of 2022 Chandrakant Prasad S/o Shri Ramsewak Prasad Aged About 48 Years R/o Kumharaband, Pujaripara, Ward No. 3, Jagdalpur, District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, General Administration Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Chhattisgah. 3 - High Level Caste Scrutiny Committee Through Its Member Secretary O/o Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Block 4d, Ground - Floor, Indravati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) WPC No. 4349 of 2022 Kanti Prasad W/o Shri Ramsewak Prasad Aged About 47 Years R/o Kumharaband, Pujaripara, Ward No. 3, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary General Administration Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - High Level Caste Scrutiny Committee Through Its Member Secretary O/o Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Block 4d, Ground Floor, Indravati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2025.01.10 10:32:12 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents 1 & 2/State : Mr. Keshav Prasad Gupta, Govt. Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 09/01/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw above two writ petitions with liberty to file better constituted petitions. 2. Learned counsel for the State has no objection on the above prayer. 3. Prayer is allowed and learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to withdraw the above petitions with liberty as prayed for. 4. Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Bini