APHC010547522018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25920/2018 Between: 1. N.ANJANEYULU, S/O LATE SRI MADHUSUDHAN RAO AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, WORKING AS MANAGER KRISHNA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD PEDANA BRANCH, PEDANA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. G.S.PRAKASH RAO, S/O LATE SRI JAGANADHA RAO AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, WORKING AS MANAGER KRISHNA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD MACHILIPATNAM BRANCH, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. M.SATYANARAYANA VARA PRASAD, S/O KOTESHWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, WORKING AS MANAGER KRISHNA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD BHAVANIPURAM BRANCH, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE AND COOPERATION DEPARTMENT, VEIGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE KRISHNA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD, REP BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE KRISHNA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD, REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M SHALINI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V KISHORE 2. GP FOR AGRICULTURE (AP) The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents in issuing impugned proceedings dated 19-07- 2018 transferring the petitioners to the places where they have not opted is arbitrary, violative of their own byelaws and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and set aside the same” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.M.Shalini, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that, no further orders are required as the matter has become infructuous. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Agriculture would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed as the relief has become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:27.03.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.25920 of 2018 Dt.27.03.2025 Dinesh