Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2494 RFA No. 2357 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2357 OF 2023 (PA/DE/IN) BETWEEN:
1. SMT. SHASHIKALA W/O SRI KAVALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
2. SMT SHIVAMMA D/O LATE SRI AJJAPPA @ AJJANNA @ AJJAIAH, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
APPELLANTS NO.1 AND 2 ARE R/O NO.219, NAGADEVANAHALLI, BANGALORE SOUTH, BANGALORE-560 056. 3. SRI THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, S/O LATE AJJAPPA @ AJJANNA @ AJJAIAH, R/O NO.295/75, BEHIND BHOOTAPPA TEMPLE, NAGADEVANAHALLI, BANGALORE SOUTH, BENGALURU-560 098. 4. SRI KRISHNAPPA.A., AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O LATE AJJAPPA @ AJJANNA @ AJJAIAH, R/O NO.5/A, 2ND CROSS, BEHIND BHOOTAPPA TEMPLE, NAGADEVANAHALLI, BANGALORE SOUTH BENGALURU-560 098. Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2494 RFA No. 2357 of 2023
5. SRI CHIKKANNA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O LATE AJJAPPA @ AJJANNA @ AJJAIAH, R/O NO.296, 80 FEET RING ROAD, NEAR BHOOTAPPA TEMPLE, NAGADEVANAHALLI, BANGALORE SOUTH, BENGALURU-560 056. 6. SRI SIRIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O LATE AJJAPPA @ AJJANNA @ AJJAIAH, R/O NO.219/1, 80 FEET RING ROAD, BEHIND BHOOTAPPA TEMPLE, NAGADEVANAHALLI, BANGALORE SOUTH, BENGALURU-560 056. 7. SRI KALLAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O LATE AJJAPPA @ AJJANNA @ AJJAIAH, R/O NO.219-1, NAGADEVANAHALLI, JNANABHARATHI POST, BANGALORE-560 056. 8. SMT NAGAMMA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, D/O LATE AJJAPPA @ AJJANNA @ AJJAIAH, W/O CHITHRALINGAIAH, R/O NO.30, SANGAPURA GOLLARA HATTI, TUMKUR-572 168. APPELLANTS ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR GPA HOLDERS,
9. SRI MARUTHI H S/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT NO.117, 3RD MAIN, 3RD CROSS, SIDDHARTHA ROAD, DEEPANJALINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 026. - 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2494 RFA No. 2357 of 2023
10. SRI MOHAMMED ARIF JAMEEL S/O LATE ABDUL RASHEED, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT NO.179, 2ND FLOOR, 5TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN, 3RD STAGE, PILLANA GARDEN, BANGALORE-560 045. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. RAHAMATULLA KOTHWAL., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT. LEELAMMA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, W/O K.V.CHANDRASHEKAR, R/O NO.296, KAMAKSHIPALYA, MAGADI ROAD, BENGALURU-560 079. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K.V.DHANANJAY., ADVOCATE FOR C/R)
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDER, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Counsel for the appellants has appeared in person and submits that short accommodation may be granted to comply with the office objections.
This Court is not inclined to grant time. The reason is simple. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed before the Registrar (P & H) and time was granted to
- 4 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2494 RFA No. 2357 of 2023
comply with the office objections. Thereafter, the appeal was listed before the Court on 10.01.2025, on that day, finally, two week's time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the appeal was ordered to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections' on 21.01.2025. The appeal is listed today under the caption 'for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections'. Despite granting sufficient time, the office objections are not complied with. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 67