931 to 938.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 931 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 749 OF 2024 IN FAST/39106/2023 Mohan Namdeo Patil And Ors VERSUS Sub Divisional Officer, Taloda, And Anr ... 933 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 758 OF 2024 IN FAST/39103/2023 Gautamchand Anopchand Jain VERSUS Sub Divisional Officer, Taloda, And Anr ... 934 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 759 OF 2024 IN FAST/39194/2023 Vilas Dagadu Mali VERSUS Sub Divisional Officer, Taolda, Sub Divisional Office, Nandurbar And Anr ... 935 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 760 OF 2024 IN FAST/39192/2023 Pankaj Jagannath Mali VERSUS Sub Divisional Officer, Taolda, Sub Divisional Office, Nandurbar And Anr ... 936 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 761 OF 2024 IN FAST/39190/2023 Yashwant Vasant Mali (suryawanshi) VERSUS Sub Divisional Officer, Taolda, Sub Divisional Office, Nandurbar And Anr … 937 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 762 OF 2024 IN FAST/39187/2023 Harish Ramkrishna Patil (dead) Thr Lrs. Malati Umesh PAGE 1 OF 3 2025:BHC-AUG:19395 931 to 938.odt Harishchandra Patil And Ors VERSUS Sub Divisional Officer, Taloda, Sub Divisional Office, Nandurbar And Anr ... 938 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 764 OF 2024 IN FAST/39183/2023 Eknath Vasant Mali (suryawanshi) VERSUS Sub Divisional Officer, Taloda, Sub Divisional Office, Nandurbar And Anr *** • Mr. Firoj Shirpurkar a/w Mr. Jay Raundale h/f Mr. K. M. More, Advocate for the Applicants • Mr. S. K. Shirse, Mr. S. N. Kendre & Ms. R. R. Tandale, AGPs for the Respondents/State in respective Applications *** CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J DATE : JULY 23, 2025 PER COURT : 1. These Applications are filed for condonation of delay of 233, 227 & 129 days respectively caused in preferring Appeal against judgment and order passed by the Reference Court. 2. It is the case of the Applicants that on account of financial crisis and for want of legal knowledge, the proceedings were not filed within limitation. 3. Learned Counsel for the Applicants, on Umesh PAGE 2 OF 3 931 to 938.odt instructions, records statement that the Applicants would not claim any interest on the enhanced amount from the date of order till the registration of the First Appeal. The said statement is accepted as an undertaking to this Court. 4. Perusal of these Applications indicate that the delay has been satisfactorily explained. Further more, the undertaking given by the Counsel for Applicants of not claiming the interest on the enhanced amount takes care of the grievance of the Respondent. Hence, Applications stand allowed. Delay stands condoned. Appeals be registered. 5. It is clarified that Applicants shall not be entitled to claim any interest from the date of the impugned order till the registration of the First Appeals. (R. M. JOSHI, J.) Umesh PAGE 3 OF 3