SRI LAXMI NARASIMHA CONSTRUCTIONS,W.G.DIST. v. A.P.E.P.D.C.L.,VISAKHAPATNAM, & 4 OTRS.
WP/19812/2014 · 2025-09-02
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34873 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34873 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 APHC010547082014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 19812 OF 2014 Between: 1.SRI LAXMI NARASIMHA CONSTRUCTIONS,W.G.DIST., NEAR GOVT. HOSPITAL, VELPUR, TATIUKU, WEST GODAVARI DIST. REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR CH. LAXMI BALA TRIPURA SUNDARI ...PETITIONER AND 1.A P E P D C L VISAKHAPATNAM 4 OTRS, ANDHRA PRADESH LTD., VISAKHAPATNAM DABA GARDENS, VISAKHAPATNAM REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR 2.EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF, ANDHRA PRADESH LTD., OPERATION CIRCLE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT REP. BY ITS SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER 3.EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF, ANDHRA PRADESH LTD., OPERATION CIRCLE, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT REP. BY ITS DIVISIONAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER 4.EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF, ANDHRA PRADESH LTD., OPERATION CIRCLE, D-1, TANUKU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT REP. BY ITS ADDL. ASST. ENGINEER 5.EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF, ANDHRA PRADESH LTD., OPERATION CIRCLE, ELECTRICAL REVENUE OFFICE, TANUKU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT REP. BY ITS ASST. 2 ACCOUNTS OFFICER ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.T V S PRABHAKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: None for the Writ Petitioner. Heard Ms. Aiswarya Chowdary, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri V.V. Satish, Ld. Standing Counsel for the APEPDCL. 2. On 30.07.2014, this Court had passed the following interim Order in W.P.M.P.No.24816 of 2014. “The case of the petitioner is that it has applied for allotment of transformer vide application dated 14.05.2014 to the respondents. But, no orders are passed on the same. Aggrieved by the same, present writ petition is filed. In view of the above, there shall be a direction to the respondents to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 14.05.2014 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.”
3. The above prayer would indicate that the Writ Petitioner is agitating allotment and installation of transformer at the complex of the Writ Petitioner plot Nos. 1 and 2 in Survey Nos. 352/4, 350/5 and 350/6 of Relangi Village and Gram Panchayat of Iragavaram Mandal of West Godavari District. 4. The nature of the above prayer would indicate that the request of the Writ Petitioner regarding the allotment and installation of the transformer in the complex would not survive till date. 3
5.
Since this Writ Petition is of the year 2014, this Court deems it appropriate to close this Writ Petition. 6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. 7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 03.09.2025 Mnr 97
4 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 19812 OF 2014 Dt: 03.09.2025 Mnr