BHUPENDRA SINGH DOMIR v. CHHATTISGARH STATE COOPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION
WPC/3282/2019 · 2025-04-02
Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34868 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34868 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:15526
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3282 of 2019 1 - Bhupendra Singh Domir S/o Late Manohar Singh Aged About 55 Years R/o Imlipara, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Marketing Federation (Markfed) Cbd 6th Floor, Sector 21, Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh 492101 (Chhattisgarh). 2 - Collector Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - District Marketing Officer Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Marketing Federation (Markfed), Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - District Marketing Officer Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Marketing Federation (Markfed), Mungeli, Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondents For Petitioner : None appears even in the second round. For State
: Ms. Neelima Singh Thakur, Panel Lawyer For respondents No.1,3 : Mr. Harshal Chouhan, Advocate and 4 Hon'ble Shri Justice
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Order on Board 02.04.2025
1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief (s) :
“i. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the order dated 13/9/2013 (Annexure →P/1) passed by the respondent No.4. ii. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to consider the case of the petitioner and award him the transportation work in the MARKFED. iii. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner pursuant to the
order impugned i.e. Annexure P/1 REKHA SINGH Digitally signed by REKHA SINGH
-2- iv. Cost of the petition may also be granted to the petitioner. v. Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper, may also kindly be granted to the petitioner, in the interest of justice.”
2. The order impugned was passed on 13.09.2013.
3. It appears that by efflux of time, the petitioner has lost his interest in pursuing the matter, therefore, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed on this count alone. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge Rekha