Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34864 (RAJ)

BHAGIRATH SINGH SON KALYAN SINGH RANAN v. M/S ADITYA BUILDERS

CW/28/2025 · 2025-02-05

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:4991] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 28/2025 Bhagirath Singh Son Kalyan Singh Ranan, Resident Of Durga Colony, Sikar Tenant Shop No. 01, Sony Bhawan, Rajshri Cinema Road, Sikar Tehsil And District -Sikar. ----Petitioner/Non-Applicant/Tenant Versus 1. M/s Aditya Builders, Khandela Road, Post Palsana Tehsil Danta Ramgarh District - Sikar (Registered Firm) Through Partner. 1/1. Manoj Jangid Son Of Sanwarmal Jangid, Resident Of Village Sundarpura, Palsanan Tehsil Dataramgarh, District Sikar. 1/2. Lalit Kumar Agarwal Son Of Ram Rrichpal Agarwal, Resident Of Ward No. 17, Post Palsana, Tehsil Dantramgarh District Sikar. 1/3. Rajesh Kumar Soni Son Of Durga Dutt Soni, Resident Of Tirupati Nagar, Rampura Road, Tehsil And District Sikar. 1/4. Laxman Singh Son Of Khem Singh, Resident Of Chhota Pana Ki Khoti, Palsana Tehsil Danta Ramgarh, District - Sikar. 1/5. Bawar Singh Khichad Son Of Ran Veer Singh, Resident Of Dhod Road, Byoass Chauraha, Tehsi And District Sikar. 1/6. Om Singh Dujod Son Of Gopal Singh, Resident Of Dujod Tehsil And District Sikar. ----Respondents-Applicants/Landlord For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ramesh Chandra Kumawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Kumar Jangid HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 05/02/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:4991] (2 of 3) [CW-28/2025] Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, does not press the writ petition on merits and prays for a reasonable time (upto 31.07.2026) to vacate the premises. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection to the prayer made; he, however, submits that the petitioner may be granted time subject to payment of a sum of Rs.2,000/- per month by way of mesne profit. This is not objected by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In the aforesaid circumstance, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. The petitioner is granted time upto 31.07.2026 to hand over vacant and peaceful possession of the rented premises to the respondents subject to following conditions:- 1. The entire arrears of rent/mesne profit till date, shall be deposited by the petitioner in the bank account of respondents within a period of four weeks from the date of the order. 2. The petitioner shall pay a sum of 2,000 ₹ /- per month towards mesne profit to the respondents from 01.03.2025 till vacation of the rented premises i.e. on or before 31.07.2026, which may be deposited by him in the bank account of the respondents by 10th day of each succeeding month. 3. The petitioner further undertakes that he shall not sub-let, assign or part with possession of rented premises or any part thereof in favour of anyone else and would not create any third party interest in the same during the aforesaid period. 4. The petitioner shall furnish a written undertaking incorporating aforesaid conditions before the learned Rent Tribunal within a period of four weeks from today. It is made clear that in case, petitioner does not comply with any of aforesaid conditions, the learned Rent Tribunal shall ensure his [2025:RJ-JP:4991] (3 of 3) [CW-28/2025] eviction without requiring respondents to file a separate execution petition even before aforesaid date and it will also be open for respondents to initiate contempt proceedings in this Court. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J DIKSHA /62