IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NOs: 147. 150. 151.152. AND 232 OF 2015 APHC010542182015 LAAS. No. 147 of 2015: Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894, against the Order and decree passed in O.P. No. 809 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District, dated 22-4-2015. Between: The Special Deputy Collector (L.A), Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...Appellant/Referring Officer AND 0- r Samuel, S/o. Paul, aged 71 yrs, R/o. Gopavaram Village, Mahanandi ' Marrdal, Kurnool District. I ...Respondent/Claimant •# lA NO: 1 OF 2015(LAASMP 688 OF 20151: Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstancijs stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be p grant; stay of all further proceedings including Execution in L/^OP No. 809/2009 on the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, District. eased to Kurnool Counsel for the Petitioner: GP FOR APPEALS Counsel for the Respondent: NONE APPEARED APHC010562032015 ■ LAAS. No. 150 of 2015: Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894, against the Order and decree passed in O.P. No.817 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the II A Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District, dated 22-4-2015. Between: I The s()ecial Deputy Collector (L.A), Telugu Ganga Project. Nandyal, District. dditional Kurnool ...Appellant/Referrinc Officer AND 3 Yerramala Munaiah, S/o Pedda Munaiah, aged 68 Yrs Village, Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District. R/o Gopavaram ...Respondent/Claimant lA NO: 1 OF 2015rLAASMP 750 OF 2015): I I Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including Execution in LAOP No. 817/2009 on the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, iKurnool District. ’ Counsel for the Petitioner: GP FOR APPEALS Counsel for the Respondent: NONE APPEARED APHC010612012015 LAAS. No. 151 of 2015: Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894, against the Order and decree passed in O.P. No. 815 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the II Ac^ditional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District, dated 22-4-2015. i Between: The Special Deputy Collector (L.A), Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal District. Kurnool ...Appellant/Referring Officer AND t Kasejtty Rameswaraiah, S/o Ramaiah, aged 65 yrs, R/o Gopavarani Village Mah^nandi Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/ Claimant lA Nd): 1 OF 2015(LAASMP 752 OF 2015): Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be p grant‘ stay of all further proceedings including Execution in uj^OP No. 815/2009 on the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal District. eased to Kurnool Counsel for the Petitioner: GP FOR APPEALS Counsel for the Respondent: NONE APPEARED APHC010713582015 LAAS. No. 152 of 2015: Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894, against the Order and decree passed in O.P. No. 808 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the II /Additional I Seniof Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District, dated 22-4-2015. Between: The Special Deputy Collector (L.A), Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, District Kurnool ...Appellant/Referrinci Officer AND r 5 Sure Kondaiah, S/o Venkataswamy, aged 73 Yrs, R/o Giddaluru, Pfakasam District ...Respondent/Claimant lA NO: 1 OF 2015(LAASMP 754 OF 2015^: Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including Execution in LAOP No. 808/2009 on the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District. Counsel for the Petitioner: GP FOR APPEALS Counsel for the Respondent: NONE APPEARED APHC010497212015 LAAS. No. 232 of 2015: Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894, against passed in O.P. No. 807 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District, dated 22-4-2015. the Order and decree Between: The Special Deputy Collector (L.A), Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. i ...Appellant/Referring Officer AND G Pinnapuram Kailash, S/o Pullaiah, aged 37 Yrs, R/o Gopavaram Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District. Village ...Respondent/Glalmant lA NO: 1 OF 2015 (LAASMP 876 OF 2015): Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstanc i in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be p grant stay of all further proceedings including Execution in L/toP No. 807/2 D09 on the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal District. 5s stated eased to Kurnool Counsel for the Petitioner: GP FOR APPEALS Counsel for the Respondent: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: APHC010542182015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3526] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT Nos. 147, 150. 151,152 and 232 of 2015 LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT No. 147 of 2015 Between: 1.THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR (L.A), TELUGU GANGA PROJECT, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. : ...APPELLANT AND 1.P SAMUEL, S/o. Paul R/o. Gopavaram Village, Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District. ...RESPONDENT To allow the above appeal by setting aside the order and decree passed by the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District in OP No. 809 of 2009, dated 22-4-2015. Counsel for the Appellant: 1.GP FOR APPEALS (AP) Mr. T.S.Rayalu Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: 2 COMMON JUDGMENT: {Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ninala Jayasurya) The present batch of appeals have been filed against the conimon order dated 22.04.2015 on the file of the Court of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, in L.A.O.P.Nos.815, 807, 808 809 and 817 of 2009. At the time of considering the appeals, learned Government Pleader for Appeals fairly stated that the matters are covered b the decision of this Court in L.A.A.S. No. 159 of 2015 and batch cated 10.67.2025. Considering the said submission and for the reasons alike, tiese appeals are dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in t cases shall stand closed. lese Sd/-S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT^REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SEC C FFICER To 1. p'he II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District. (vith records) 2. JwoCCsto GP for Appeals (AP) High Court of Andhra Pradesi [OUT] 3. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesi. 4. Two CD Copies Skm sree *Along with photocopy of certified copy of Common Judgment dated 10.07.2025 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in LAAS.No.159 of 2015 & Batch HIGH COURT DATED:17/07/2025 COMMON JUDGMENT + DECREES § 20 AUG 2025 i . Current S< ciion * ^ ^’^'!S!5£^SPATC LAAS NOs.147, 150, 151, 152 &232 OF 2015 ALL APPEALS ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT COSTS 1 NJSJ &TRR,J LAAS 159 2015 & batch APHC010742722015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3526] THURSDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT Nos: 159. 165.185. 186. 194 and ^97 of 2015 LAAS No.159 of 2015 Between: 1. The Special Deputy Collector (L.A), Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...APPELLANT AND 1. S.Subramanyam Achari, S/o.Sekharachari, Aged 63 years, R/o. Gopavaram Village, Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1.GP FOR APPEALS (AP) Counsel for the Respondent: -None- 2 NJS,. & TRR, J LAAS_159 201! & batch The Court made the following Common Judgment: (PerHon'biesnjusticeMnak Heard Mr.T.S.Rayalu, learned Government Pleader for Appeals. Aggrieved by a Common Order dated 22.04.2015 in the L.A.O.P.No.800 Jayasurya) 2. of 2009 & batch on the file of the Court of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, the State preferred the present batch of appeals. The respondents herein are the claimants in L.A.O.P.Nos.800, 801, 803, 804, 805 and 806 of 2009. 3. For the purpose of excavation of Major Distributory in Block N0.13 of Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, the Special Deputy Collector (land acquisition) issued a Notification dated 28.04.2005 under Section 4 (1 Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) for acquisition of an extent of Ac. 19.14 cents in various survey numbers of Gopj Village, Mahanandi Mandal belonging to the respondents / claimants. The Draft Declaration under Section 6 of the Act was published on 26.04.2005. Thereafter, the Land Acquisition Officer by conducting Award classified the lands into three categories i.e., (i) rainfed dry lands, (ii) dr} lands irrigated with bore water and (iii) plantain garden lands and fixed the I value @ Rs.37,000/-, Rs.46,000/- and Rs.54,000/- per acre respective respondents / claimants while receiving the compensation under sought reference under Section 18 of the Act. of the of land varam enquiry. narket y. The Drotest 4. Before the Reference Court, they claimed an amount of Rs.2,0 ),000/- per acre and in support of their case, examined R.Ws.1 and 2 and got r narked Ex.BI-Certified Copy of the Sale Deed dated 09.02.2004. On behalf of the 3 NJS,J&jTRR,J LAAS_159 2015 &>batch Referring Officer, no oral evidence was adduced. Copy of the Award No.45/2006-07 dated 21.08.2006 in respect of the lands in question was marked as Ex.AI with consent. 5. The Reference Court, after examining the oral and documeptary evidence, enhanced the compensation in respect of Category No.I lands from Rs.37,000/- to Rs.1,14,000/- and Category No.II lands from Rs.46,000/- to Rs.1,35,000/-. 6. Mr.T.S.Rayalau, the learned Government Pleader, vehemently I contends that the enhancement of the compensation by the Reference Court is without any valid basis. He submits that the respondents / claimants have not adduced any cogent evidence to substantiate their claim for enhancement of the compensation. He argues that Ex.B1-Sale transaction dated 09.02.2004 is in respect of the lands situated in a different village, i.e. Gajulapalli, whereas the acquired lands are situated in Gopavaram Village. Further, that a small extent of Ac.0.68 cents was sold and the learned Reference Court went wrong in taking the said transaction into consideration for the purpose of fixing the market value. He also contends that the value appreciation @ 12% p.a., as adopted by the learned Reference Court i^ not tenable and at the most 10% value appreciation is reasonable. Making the said submissions, he urges for allowing the appeals. 7. This Court has considered the submissions made and on an appreciation of the same, the point that arises for consideration is : Whether 4 NJS, J & TRR, J U\AS_159_2015 & batch the Common Order under challenge warrants interference by this Cour; in the facts and circumstances of the case? 8. At the outset, it may be appropriate to mention that hundreds of a land situated in different villages of Nandyal District were acquired purpose of the Telugu Ganga Project. Most of these villages are cont guous and nature of the land in most of these villages is similar. Be that as it may. As noted earlier, seeking enhancement of the compensation in respect of the subject matter lands, the respondents / claimants got examined R.W.1 (claimant in L.A.O.P.No.800 of 2009) and R.W.2. They relied on Ex.B1 cres of 'or the 9. dated 09.02.2004 which is in respect of land situated in the neighbouring Gajulapalli Village. R.W.1 in his evidence testified that the nature, potentiality and value of the lands under acquisition are similar to that of Ex.BI land, fiothing Tiarket was elicited in the cross examination contrary to the said version. On the other hand, R.W.2, who is an attestor of Ex.BI in his cross examiiation, deposed that the value of the lands of Gopavaram, Gajulapal Seetharamapuram villages etc., are of the same value. It was further drought on record in the evidence that Gopavaram village is very nearer to Gajulapalli village and the distance between the two villages is 2 Kms., that Gopavaram Village is situated on the main road from Nandyal to Guntur State Hi( Further, that the lands under acquisition are black cotton soil lands like chillies, jowar etc., are being raised. No oral evidence was adduced behalf of the Referring Officer, but as it is claim for enhancement, the l)urden is on the respondents to prove their case, by adducing evidence. The i and hway. anc crops on 5 NJS, J & TRR, J LAAS_159_2015 & batch evidence brought on record supports their case and no contra evidence was adduced. Therefore, though Ex.B1-Sale transaction is in respect of another village, taking into consideration the nature of the land, potentiality and the distance of 2 Kms., the market value of the subject matter lands can be determined and the contention of the learned Government Pleader in this regard merits no appreciation. Fixation of compensation on the basis of the value of the land in the adjoining villages having similar nature and potentiality was approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in G.M., O.N.G.C. Ltd., v. 1 Sendhabhai Vastram Patel & Ors., 10. Insofar as the other contention advanced by the learned Government Pleader that Ex.BI is in respect of a small extent and further that value appreciation of 12% p.a., is not tenable / reasonable, the same deserves no acceptance. More than a half acre was sold vide Ex.BI-Sale Deed dated 09.02.2004 which was abogt one year two months prior to the issuance of Section 4 (1) Notification in respect of the lands in question. It is not the case of the appellant-State that the sale transaction was in respect of some house sites or that the same is not genuine. Under the said circumstances, reliance on Ex.BI by the Reference Court cannot be found fault with. That apart, 12% value'appreciation as per the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Union of India v. Om Prakash (died) by LRs ^, can be taken into (2005) 6 see 454 ^ AIR 2004 see 4135 6 NJS, ) & TRR, J LAAS_159_2015 & batch consideration. Therefore, the contentions advanced on behalf of the S rejected. ate are 11. The learned Reference Court on a proper appreciation of the mal|ter and keeping in view of the difference between the dry lands and the lands having irrigation source under Category 1 and Category 2 respectively as ilso by assigning cogent reasons was justified in enhancing the compensation. This Court, therefore, is of the opinion that the fixation of compensation in lespect are n d good grounds warranting interference in the order under challenge. Accordingly, the point is answered. of the subject matter lands is just and reasonable and that there 12. In the aforesaid view of the matter, the appeals fail and the accordingly dismissed. No costs. Applications pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed. same are Consequently, the Miscelk neous JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAF: RAO BLV Dt.l 10.07.2025 APHC010542182015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 151 OF 2015 Between: The Special Deputy Collector (L.A), Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...Appellant/Referring Officer AND Kasetty Rameswariah, S/o Ramaiah, aged 65 Yrs, R/o. Gopavaram Village Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894, against the Order and decree passed in LAO.P. No. 815 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District, dated 22-4-2015. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court, and material the petition and upon hearing arguments of GP for Appeals for the Appellant and none appeared for respondent. papers in THIS COURT DOTH ORDER AND DECREE: 1. That the Land Acquisition Appeal suit be and is hereby dismiss<5d. 2. That there shall be no order as to costs in this Land Acqu Appeal suit. sition Sd/-S.V.S.R.MURTHy^ JOINT.REGISI^^ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFF ICER To, 1. The II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District 2. Two CD Copies Skm sree HIGH COURT DATED: 17/07/2025 I 2 0 AUG im ^^ Currant Section . 5s^£^SPATCH«2^ DECREE LAAS NO. 151 OF 2015 C9/ DISMISSING THE LAAS WITHOUT COSTS APHC010542182015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE I PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 152 OF 2015 Between; The Special Deputy Collector (L.A), Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...Appellant/Referring Officer AND Sure Kondiah, S/o Venkataswamy, aged 73 Yrs, R/o Giddaluru, Prakasam District ...Respondent/Claimant Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894, against the Order and decree passed in LAOP.No.808 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District, dated 22-04-2015. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court, and material papers in the petition and upon hearing arguments of GP for Appeals for the Appellant and none appeared for the respondent, THIS COURT DOTH ORDER AND DECREE: 1. That the Land Acquisition Appeal suit be and is hereby dismissed. 2. That there shall be no order as to costs in this Land Acquisition Appeal suit. Sd/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTR^^ drS^FICER //TRUE COPY// SE To, 1. The II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District 2. Two CD Copies Skm sree HIGH COURT DATED:17/07/2025 I 2 (I AUG 2025 1 ^ . Current Section DECREE LAASNO. 152 OF 2015 •a DISMISSING THE LAAS WITHOUT COSTS ' % APHC010542182015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA .<■ ' AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 147 OF 2015 Between: The Special Deputy Collector (L.A), Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...Appellant/Referring Officer AND P Samuel, S/o. Paul, aged 71 yrs, R/o. Gopavaram Village, Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894, against the Order and decree passed in O.P. No. 809 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District, dated 22-4-2015. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court, and material the petition and upon hearing arguments of GP for Appeals for Appellant. THIS COURT DOTH ORDER AND DECREE: papers in the 0 1. That the Land Acquisition Appeal suit be and is hereby dismissed. 2. That there shall be no order as to costs in this Land Acquisition Appeal suit. Sd/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR C'rl^rOFFICER //TRUE COPY// SE To, 1. The II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District 2. Two CD Copies Skm sree HIGH COURT DATED:17/07/2025 DECREE LAAS NO. 147 OF 2015 •5 20 AUG 2025 m *9 Section . DISMISSING THE LAAS WITHOUT COSTS APHC010542182015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY fO TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 150 OF 2015 Between: The Special Deputy Collector (L.A), Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...Appellant/Referring Officer AND Yerramala Munaiayh, S/o Pedda Munaiah aged 68 Yrs, R/o. Gopavaram Village, Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894, against the Order and decree passed in LAO.P. No. 817 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District, dated 22-4-2015. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court, and material papers in the petition and upon hearing arguments of GP for Appeals for the Appellant and none appeared for respondent. THIS COURT DOTH ORDER AND DECREE: 1. That the Land Acquisition Appeal suit be and is hereby dismissed. 2. That there shall be no order as to costs in this Land Acquisition Appeal suit. Sd/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR JtloSoFFICER //TRUE COPY// SEC To, 1. The II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District 2. Two CD Copies Skm sree HIGH COURT DATED:17/07/2025 DECREE I 20AU6 2025 rr Current Ssciion ^ LAAS NO. 150 OF 2015 DISMISSING THE LAAS WITHOUT COSTS APHC010542182015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI <5 l iiL o fi, > 'o/j THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY^ Wt A TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE <S> PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 232 OF Between: The Special Deputy Collector (L.A), Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ..■Appellant/Referring Officer AND Pinnapuram Kailash. S/o Pullaiah, aged 37 Yrs Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District R/o Gopavaram Village, ...Respondent/Claimant Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894, against the Order and decree passed in LAO.P. No. 807 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District, dated 22-4-2015. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court, and material papers in If the petition and upon hearing arguments of GP for Appeals for the Appellant and none appeared for the respondent. THIS COURT DOTH ORDER AND DECREE: 1. That the Land Acquisition Appeal suit be and is hereby dismissed. 2. That there shall be no order as to costs in this Land Acquisition Appeal suit. Sd/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// CTlSf^FICER SE To, 1. The II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District 2. Two CD Copies Skm sree i HIGH COURT DATED:17/07/2025 DECREE LAAS NO. 232 OF 2015 B 2 0 AUG 2025 ^ . Current section , ^ m DISMISSING THE LAAS WITHOUT COSTS