1 2025:CGHC:8260 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6315 of 2021 1 - Manish Mishra S/o Late Shri Bisahu Lal Mishra Aged About 38 Years Deputy Commissioner (State Tax), Head Office, Gst Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Commercial Tax, Mahanadi Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Commissioner State Tax, North Block Sector, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Mahendra Dhanelia, Deputy Commissioner, State Tax, Head Office State Tax Bhawan, Sector 19, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - Ku. Josita Tigga, Deputy Commissioner, State Tax, O/o Joint Commissioner, Division Durg, Dist. Durg Chhattisgarh 5 - Mukesh Kumar Tyagi, Deputy Commissioner, State Tax, O/o Joint Commissioner, Raipur Division Ii, Civil Line, Raipur Dist. Raipur Chhattisgarh 6 - Gulapa Purseth, Deputy Commissioner, State Tax O/o Joint Commissioner, Raipur Division Ii, Civil Lines Raipur, Dist.Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Ghanshyam Patel, Advocate For State : Mr. Aman Tamboli, Panel Lawyer For Respondent Nos. 4 to 6 : Mr. Siddhant Das, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Gary Mukhopadhyay, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 18.02.2025 BHUMIKA ANGARE Digitally signed by BHUMIKA ANGARE Date: 2025.02.19 10:53:04 +0530 2 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition being aggrieved with the order dated 08.10.2021 passed by respondent No. 1 by which the representation submitted by the petitioner has been rejected. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that after filing of the petition, the petitioner has preferred representation and in that matter the State has sought opinion from the Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission who has his given its opinion. 3. Now the matter is lying with the respondent/State. 4. The State is directed to take final decision within eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order. 5. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file afresh petition or take any other recourse available to him under the law, if he is not satisfied with the final outcome of the decision to be taken by the State. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Bhumika