- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:14632 WP No. 26980 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 26980 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. S.A. IMAM SAB S/O ABDUL MAZEED AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/O KOTHAVARI PALLI MADANAPALLI TALUK CHITTOOR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH - 517 319. PRESENTLY RESIDING AT R/A NO 15-75 NANDIREDDI GARI PALLI VILLAGE ANGALLU POST, MADANAPALLI KURABALAKOTTA SUB DISTRICT CHITTOOR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH - 517 326. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. V.B. SIDDARAMAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE M S BUILDING, DR AMBEDAR VEEDI BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT DC OFFICE Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:14632 WP No. 26980 of 2023 VISHWANATHAPURA DEVANAHALLI - 561 203. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION TALUK OFFICE ROAD DODDABALLAPURA - 561 203. 4. THE TAHASILDAR KAMAVARIPETTE HOSAKOTE TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 114. 5. THE ASST. DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS KAMAVARIPETTE, HOSAKOTE TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 114. 6. SRI. H.K. ABDUL MAJED S/O LATE ABDUL KHADARSAB AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/O 2ND CROSS, KARNATAKA LAYOUT KANOORAHALLI ROAD HOSAKOTE TOWN BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SAVITHRAMMA, AGA FOR R1 TO R5; SRI. P.N. NANJA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R6) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 02.06.2023 PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT, THE ASST. COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPURA SUB- DIVISION, DEVANAHALLI, BENGALURU RURUAL DISTRICT, PASSED IN CASE IN RA(H): 457/2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-H. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:14632 WP No. 26980 of 2023 ORAL ORDER 1. The Assistant Commissioner in appeal under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (for short, 'the Act') has allowed the appeal and remanded the matter to the Tahasildar for fresh consideration. 2. Sri.V.B.Siddaramaiah, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that, as a matter of fact, as against this order passed in appeal, a revision was preferred and the said revision was also dismissed by issuance of an endorsement. 3. In my view, since the Assistant Commissioner has thought it fit to remand the matter to the Tahasildar, there is no justification to entertain the writ petition. 4. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE RK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 80