IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 101 COCP No.1501 of 2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 09.04.2025 Rakesh Singh Gusain …Petitioner V/s Seema and another …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. R.D. Bawa, Advocate, Mr. Samuel Gill, Advocate, Mr. Rishabh Rana, Advocate and Mr. Randhir Bawa, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Shivoy Dhir, Sr. Panel Counsel, for the respondents-UOI. *** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL) The present contempt petition has been filed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 27.05.2024 (Annexure P-1) and the order dated 11.05.2018 (Annexure P-4) passed by coordinate Benches of this Court in CWP-11969-2018. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents submits that in compliance with the order dated 27.05.2024 (Annexure P-1), a fresh order was passed. He further submits that initially a sum of Rs.26,35,180/- was claimed from the petitioner vide order dated 11.03.2025 (Annexure P-7), which has now been reduced to Rs.2,43,560/- w.e.f. 28.05.2024 to 02.04.2025. He submits that this calculation and reduction in the amount chargeable is to be approved by the Head Office. VIKAS CHANDER 2025.04.09 16.10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR No.1501 of 2025 (O&M) -2- 3. Mr. R.D. Bawa, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while taking over the possession of the premises in dispute, the articles of the petitioner have been sealed inside. He prays that as regards the imposition of rent etc., he shall initiate separate proceedings to challenge the same but prays that the petitioner be permitted to remove his articles from the premises in dispute. 4. To this, learned counsel for the respondents very fairly submits that the petitioner would be free to remove his articles from the premises in question and for the said purpose the petitioner shall be granted access to the same on 14.04.2025 from 10.00 a.m. to 2.00 p.m. 5. The present contempt petition is, therefore, disposed of in the above terms. Rule stands discharged. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE April 09, 2025 vcgarg Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VIKAS CHANDER 2025.04.09 16.10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document