1 2025:CGHC:39335 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8632 of 2025 1 - Fulmaniya Rajwade D/o Ram Charan, Aged About 38 Years R/o House No. 163, Akhora Kalan, Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Women And Child Development Department, Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 2 - Director, Directorate of Women And Child Development Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 3 - Joint Director, Directorate of Women And Child Development, Surguja Division, Sarguja, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Joint Director, Directorate of Women And Child Development, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Collector, Surajpur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 6 - District Program Officer, Women And Child Development Department, Surajpur, District Surajpur , Chhattisgarh. 7 - District Child Development Program Officer, Integrated Child Development Program, Women And Child Development Department, Surajpur, District Surajpur , Chhattisgarh. 8 - Chhattisgarh State Profession Examination Board, Through Secretary, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Saket Pandey, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Gyan Prakash Shukla, Advocate. For State/Respondents No.1 to 7 : Mr. Keshav Gupta, Govt. Advocate. For Respondent No.8 : Mr. Avinash Singh, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 06-08-2025 1. The petitioner has claimed in the present writ petition for a direction to the authorities to issue appointment order to her on the post of Supervisor as after recruitment process and counseling the authorities have not issued any order with respect to her appointment. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was a candidate for appointment on the post of Supervisor at Women and Child Development Department and she successfully cleared all the recruitment process and vide memo dated 18-09-2024 she was called for verification of the documents despite verification of her documents till date no order of appointment has been issued to her. She moved her representation to the authorities to Sushashan Tihar Scheme, but till date the authorities have not considered her representation. Therefore, a direction may be issued to the authorities to decide her representation. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the State would submit that he has no objection if such a direction is given to the authorities concerned to decide the representation of the petitioner within a stipulated time-frame. He would also submit that the petitioner may also be directed to move her fresh representation within a stipulated time frame before the concerned authority along with the relevant document. 4. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to move her fresh representation before respondent No.2 along with the documents within a further period of two weeks from today and if such representation is made, the authorities concerned shall take a decision on the representation of the 3 petitioner within a further period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of the representation in accordance with law and applicable rules and circulars of the department. 5. With the aforesaid observation and directions the present writ petition is disposed of. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authorities shall strictly consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with law. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil