Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34852 (MAD)

Mr.S.B.Jayakumar, v. S.Vijayakumar,

A/1330/2025 · 2025-03-26

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26.03.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE A.Nos.1330, 1331, 1333 and 1335 of 2025 S.B.Jayakumar and another .. Applicants in A.No.1330 of 2025 vs S.Vijayakumar and another .. Respondents in A.No.1330 of 2025 COMMON ORDER These applications have been filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act seeking extension of time for the Arbitrator to pass an Arbitral Award by another period of six months. 2.Ms.C.Shankary representing for M/s.Nathan & Associates, who has taken notice for the respondents, has stated no objection for allowing these applications. 3.This Court is satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support of these applications since sufficient cause has been shown by the applicants for seeking extension of time. 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J. vga 4.Accordingly, these applications are allowed as prayed for by granting extension of time for the Sole Arbitrator to pass an Arbitral Award by another period of 6 months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 26.03.2025 vga A.Nos.1330, 1331, 1333 and 1335 of 2025 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis