Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20078 WP No. 27752 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 27752 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
T. RAGHAVENDRA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O M THIMMEGOWDA, R/AT NO.65, VANI VILAS ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI, BANGALORE - 560 004.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANU PRABHAKAR KULKARNI., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY TAHSILDAR, T. NARASIPURA, BYRAPUR, TIRUMAKUDALU NARASIPURA, T. NARASIPURA TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT, KARNATAKA - 571 124.
2.
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ROOM NO.10, SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, MYSURU, KARNATAKA - 570 005.
Digitally signed by VIDYA G R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20078 WP No. 27752 of 2023
3.
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, GIRIBOVIYA PALYA, SIDDARTHA NAGAR, MYSURU, KARNATAKA - 570 011.
4.
SRI SURESHA M AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O LATE MAHADEVA, R/A NO.487, TYAGA MARGA, SIDDARTHA NAGAR, MYSURU CITY, KARNATAKA - 570 011.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMAED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA FOR R1 TO R3 SRI. YABESH.M ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING R1, 2 AND 3 TO CONSIDER REPRESENTATION DATED 3.8.23 MADE BY PETITIONER TO R1 (ANNEXURE-B), REPRESENTATION DATED 3.8.23 MADE BY PETITIONER TO R2 (ANNEXURE-C) AND REPRESENTATION DATED 4.8.23 MADE BY PETITIONER TO R3 (ANNEXURE-D), INDEPENDENTLY, WITHIN A TIME FRAME FIXED BY THIS HONBLE COURT, AND COMMUNICATE THEIR DECISIONS TO THE PETITIONER, AT THE EARLIEST.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20078 WP No. 27752 of 2023
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FRESH MATTERS LIST, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
ORAL ORDER
1. The petitioner has sought for a direction to respondents 1, 2 and 3 to consider the representations at Annexures - B, C and D dated 03.08.2023 and
04.08.2023.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that consequent to
order passed by the Division Bench in W.A.No.555/2007 and W.A.No.3751/2011 disposed of on 24.04.2014, the representation made is self-explanatory ought to have been considered.
3. Learned Additional Government Advocate submits that the same would be considered in accordance with law.
4. Taking note of the detailed representations made, the State to consider the representations of the petitioner and while doing so, may also afford an opportunity of
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20078 WP No. 27752 of 2023
hearing the auction purchaser insofar as his interest is concerned and proceed to pass appropriate orders.
5.
Consideration of representation to be made within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Accordingly, petition is disposed off. All contentions are kept open.
SD/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE
DHA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7