HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15932/2024 1. Vasim S/o Jamshed, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Bagichi, Police Station Kama, District Deeg, Rajasthan. Accused Is At Present In Sub Jail Deeg. 2. Mukim S/o Jamshed, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Bagichi, Police Station Kama, District Deeg, Rajasthan. Accused Is At Present In Sub Jail Deeg. ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Manjeet Kumar, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 10/01/2025 1. Petitioners have filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS. 2. F.I.R. No. 650/2024 was registered against the petitioner at Police Station Kama, District Deeg for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2) & 109(1) of BNS. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel further submits that now parties have entered into compromise and resolved their dispute amicably. Petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest. Except one case, there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioners and trial will take considerable time. Further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15932/2024] 4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners. 5. Learned counsel appearing for complainant submits that dispute between the parties has been resolved amicably and he has no objection if this bail application is accepted. 6. I have considered the contentions. 7. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties as also the fact that dispute between the parties has been resolved amicably and complainant side has no objection if this bail application is accepted; as well as considering the period of custody, but without commenting anything on merits and demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 8. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners- Vasim S/o Jamshed & Mukim S/o Jamshed shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 9. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of these instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J ANAND TANWAR /354