DR. VIPIN PRATAP GAUTAM v. UTTARAKHAND INFORMATION COMMISSION
WPMS/654/2017 · 2025-02-25
Rakesh Thapliyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3485 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3485 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/654/2017 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. None appears for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Vishal Vikram Singh, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Bhuwnesh Joshi, learned counsel for the respondents.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondents informs to this Court that petitioner is no more.
4. Since none appears for the petitioner, therefore, writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 25.02.2025 SKS