Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34846 (PAT)

Akhilesh Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./25753/2025 · 2025-05-06

Chandra Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25753 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-75 Year-2015 Thana- ATRI District- Gaya ====================================================== Akhilesh Yadav S/O Chhotan Yadav R/O Village- Sukhebigha, P.S- Atri, Distt.- Gaya, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Praveen Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Madhuri Lata ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 06-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 75 of 2015 dated 04.06.2015 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 326, 307, 353, 427, 395 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the informant got information about an altercation between two parties. When the police party reached there, in the meantime, the petitioner and the co- accused persons along with 100-150 unknown miscreants armed with pistol, lathi and danda assaulted the police party and snatched service rifle. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25753 of 2025(2) dt.06-05-2025 2/2 the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Similarly situated co-accused has already been granted anticipatory bail by the co-ordinate bench of this court vide order dated 17.01.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 55763 of 2024. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 22.12.2024. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Gaya in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 75 of 2015. 7. The application stands allowed. guddukr/- (Chandra Prakash Singh, J) U T