Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34844 (PNJ)

VEENA KUMARI v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/7406/2025 · 2025-08-20

Anupinder Singh Grewal, Deepak Manchanda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

117 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-11634-CWP-2025 in/and CWP-7406-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.08.2025 VEENA KUMARI .....Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ........Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Mr. Sakal Sikri, Advocate for the applicant-petitioner. **** ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral) CM-11634-CWP-2025 This is an application for withdrawal of the main petition. Issue notice in the application. Mr. Anant Kataria, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and Mr. Kunal Soni, Advocate for Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.2, 5 and 6. They submit that they have no objection, if the present application is allowed. For the reasons mentioned in the application and in view of no objection given by learned counsel for the respondents, the application is allowed as prayed for. The main petition is preponed and taken up for hearing today itself. SANDEEP KUMAR 2025.08.20 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-7406-2025 (O&M) -2- Main Case Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this petition, the respondents have passed an order rejecting his application and therefore, he wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh challenging the order passed by the respondents. The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE 20.08.2025 sandeep Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No SANDEEP KUMAR 2025.08.20 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.