SUNITA KUMARI RAJAK v. STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY
WPC/4368/2023 · 2025-10-07
Sri Ananda Sen
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34844 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34844 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2024:JHHC:20806 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 4368 of 2023 ------
1. Sunita Kumari Rajak, aged about 35 years, wife of Bipon Rajak, resident of Village-Naudih, PO – Tablapur, P.S.- Seraikella, District-Seraikella Kharswan (Jharkhand).
2. Jayanta Kumar Nayak, aged about 35 years, son of Sudhir Kumar Nayak, R/o Village-Jhajargram, PO- Loudaha, PS- Faridpur, District-Paschim Bardhman (West Bengal).
… … Petitioner(s) Versus
1. State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, PO & PS-Dhurwa, District- Ranchi.
2. Principal Secretary, School Education & Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, PO & PS-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi.
3. Principal Secretary, Personnel, Administrative Reforms & Rajbhasha Department, Government of Jharkhand having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, PO & PS- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi.
4. Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission through its Chairman, having its office at Kalinagar, Chai Bagan, PO & PS- Namkum, District-Ranchi.
5. The Controller of Examination, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission having its office at Kalinagar, Chai Bagan, PO & PS- Namkum, District-Ranchi. … … Respondent(s) ------
CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shivam Anand Pathak, Advocate
Mr. Arpan Manjash Ekka, Advocate
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Kishore Kr. Singh, SC-V
Mr. Krishna Prajapati, Advocate Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Advocate
Mr. Prince Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Jay Prakash, Advocate
Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Advocate
------ 05/ 07th October,2025 IA No.12860 of 2025
1.
The instant Interlocutory Application has been filed for amendment in the cause title of writ petition by amending the name of the petitioner No.2.
2.
Prayer is allowed.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to make necessary corrections in the cause title in red ink during the course of the day.
4.
Accordingly, IA No.12860 of 2025 is allowed.
2024:JHHC:20806 2
W.P.(S) No. 4368 of 2023
5.
It has been fairly submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the issue which has been raised by the petitioners in this writ petition has been answered by the Division Bench in Letters Patent Appeal No.143 of 2024 (Nirmal Pahan & Ors. Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.).
6.
Since the issue has already been decided and it has been held that no individual notices are required to be issued to the candidates for document verification, thus this writ petition is also dismissed in terms of judgment of LPA No.143 of 2024.
7.
The pending IAs, if any, also stand dismissed.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) 07th October, 2025 Sandeep.cp2