Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34837 (KAR)

GANESH A.M. @ GANESH GOWDA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/11973/2024 · 2025-01-16

Mohammad Nawaz

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1573 CRL.P No. 11973 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11973 OF 2024 (439(Cr.PC) / 483(BNSS)) BETWEEN: GANESH A.M. @ GANESH GOWDA S/O LATE MONAPPA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT AGARTHA HOUSE, KOKKADA VILLAGE AND POST, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D.K. - 574 198. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. NAZEEFA M MULLA, ADVOCATE) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA BY DHARMASTHALA POLICE STATION, REP. BY HIGH COURT SPP, BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. HARISH GANAPATHY, HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 CR.PC (FILED U/S 483 BNSS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON REGULAR BAIL IN COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, D.K., MANGALURU IN S.C.NO.4/2023 UNDER THE CRIME NO.61/2022 REGISTERED BEFORE DHARMASTALA P.S. FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 302 OF INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1573 CRL.P No. 11973 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ ORAL ORDER This is a successive bail petition preferred by the petitioner seeking to enlarge him on bail in a case pending in S.C.No.4/2023 on the file of the Court of Principal District and Sessions Judge, D.K., Mangalore. 2. Petitioner had approached this Court in Crl.P No.12987/2023 which was dismissed vide order dated 31.01.2024. 3. It is the case of prosecution that, the petitioner has committed the murder of his wife by hitting her with a wooden club. Learned counsel appearing for petitioner has contended that the deceased was a paralytic patient. Petitioner was taking care of her and he himself is physically disabled by 60%. He completely depends on the clutches to walk and therefore, the allegations that he has committed the murder is entirely false and it is a story created by the prosecution. She contended that deceased has suffered injuries on account of a fall and succumbed to - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1573 CRL.P No. 11973 of 2024 the said injuries. She submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody from 03.09.2022 i.e., for more than 2 years 4 months and the trial has not yet begun. She therefore seeks to enlarge the petitioner on bail by imposing any conditions. 4. Learned High Court Government Pleader has opposed the prayer for bail stating that this Court has already dismissed the prayer of the petitioner for bail considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case. There are no changed circumstances to once again consider the prayer. He contended that CWs.2 and 3 are the material witnesses, out of whom CW.2 is the son of the petitioner and deceased and if the petitioner is enlarged on bail, he may intimidate and influence the said witness. He has therefore sought to reject the petition. 5. This Court while dismissing the prayer of the petitioner for bail in Crl.P.No.12987/2023 has considered the entire facts and circumstances of the case. It was noticed that the deceased sustained 31 injuries as per - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:1573 CRL.P No. 11973 of 2024 post-mortem report, including laceration on the forehead. Further, CWs.2 and 3 are the material witnesses who have seen the petitioner assaulting the deceased with a wooden stick. Hence, the contention of the learned counsel that the petitioner is innocent of the offence alleged cannot be accepted. 6. The charges in this case are framed on 17.12.2024. The case is set down for trial. At this stage if the petitioner is enlarged on bail, there are chances of tampering the material witnesses. Hence, the petition is dismissed. 7. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to move the Court for bail after the examination of CWs.2 and 3. 8. The trial Court shall expedite the trial and record the evidence of CWs.2 and 3 at the earliest. Sd/- (MOHAMMAD NAWAZ) JUDGE HB/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25