- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5428 CRP No. 740 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 740 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MUNIRATHNAMMA D/O LATE KURIMARAPPA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/AT JUTTANAHALLI VILLAGE KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT 2. SMT. PARVATHAMMA D/O LATE KURIMARAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT LAKSHMIDEVIPURA VILLAGE TUBAGERE HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE KURIMARAPPA AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, 2. SRI.GOVINDAPPA, S/O LATE KURIMARAPPA AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5428 CRP No. 740 of 2024 3. SRI.SRIRAM, S/O LATE KURIMARAPPA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, 4. SRI.G.PRAKASH, S/O LATE KURIMARAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 5. SRI.G.MAHENDRAKUMAR, S/O GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 5 ARE R/A JUTTANAHALLI VILLAGE, KUNDANA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT 6. SRI.MUNEGOWDA, S/O LATE GOVINDASWAMY AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT KOLIPURA VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT 7. SRI.MANU.J.P S/O PATALAPPA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/O JUTTANAHALLI VILLAGE KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT …RESPONDENTS THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 05.03.2024 PASSED ON I.A NO. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:5428 CRP No. 740 of 2024 II IN OS.NO.294/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI, ALLOWING THE I.A NO. II FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(a) AND (d) R/W SEC. 151 OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 06.02.2025 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a Regular Appeal before the learned District and Sessions Judge, since the Civil Revision Petition is not maintainable. 2. The memo is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn while reserving liberty to the petitioner to file a Regular Appeal. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:5428 CRP No. 740 of 2024 4. If the petitioner files a Regular Appeal, the time spent by the petitioner before this Court shall be taken into consideration. 5. Certified copy if any filed along with the Civil Revision Petition may be returned to the petitioner, while retaining a copy for the records. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KLY CT: JL