[2025:RJ-JP:10491] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15056/2024 Chutraram Bera S/o Tulcharam, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Gurjaro Ka Bas, Ramawas Khurd P.s. Jaitran, District Beawar (Raj.) (At Present Confined At Sub Jail, Beawar, District Beawar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15873/2024 Mahendra Kumar S/o Sohanlal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Gram 105, Jogi Colony, Infront Of Water Bux, Maanpura, Bhakri, P.s. Sadar Pali, District Pali (Raj.) (At Present Confined At Sub Jail, Beawar, District Beawar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3247/2025 Leelaram S/o Gangaram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Beerawas, Police Station Bilada, District Jodhpur Rural (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer, District Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deshraj Kalwania Mr. Kunal Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 06/03/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.268/2019 registered at Police Station [2025:RJ-JP:10491] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15056/2024] Beawar Sadar, District Ajmer for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 365, 307, 279, 323, 341 & 395 of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submit that petitioners are not named in the FIR. It is submitted that other co-accused persons, who are named in the FIR, have been granted bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. It is submitted that petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest. Further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. Charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. He submits that petitioners are habitual offenders as several other cases have been registered against them. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, as also considering the fact that petitioners are not named in the FIR; other co-accused persons, who are named in the FIR, have been granted bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court; charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow these bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners (1) Chutraram Bera S/o [2025:RJ-JP:10491] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15056/2024] Tulcharam, (2) Mahendra Kumar S/o Sohanlal, & (3) Leelaram S/o Gangaram, shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioners, as directed above. In case the petitioners fail to mark their presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to them by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /58-60