Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34827 (KAR)

SRI. ASHFAQ AHAMED v. SMT. SYEDA MEENAZ

WP/27630/2023 · 2025-06-24

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21908 WP No. 27630 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 27630 OF 2023 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: SRI. ASHFAQ AHAMED S/O AHMED BASHA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT NO 14, 2ND CROSS, LBF ROAD, MAVALLI, BASAVANGUDI BENGALURU -560 004 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ABDUL SAB C.B., ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. SYEDA MEENAZ W/O ASHFAQ AHMED AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, AND THREE OTHER MINORS REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER SYED MEENAZ R/T NO 14, 2ND CROSS, LBF RODA, MAVALLI, BASAVANAGUDI BENGALURU -560 004 AND ALSO R/AT NO.2/34, FLAT NO 280, BASHEER KAVIL APARTMENT, TAVARKERE MAIN ROAD, MARUTHINAGAR, BTM 1ST STAGE, BENGALURU -560 058 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MANJUNATH G KANDEKAR, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21908 WP No. 27630 of 2023 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED: 18.10.2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-G, IN ITS ENTIRETY PASSED BY THE I ADDL. PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT BENGALURU ON THE FILE CRL. MIS NO. 231/21, AWARDING INTERIM MAINTENANCE OF RS. 25,000/- P.M FORM THE ATE OF APPLICATION TO THE RESPONDENT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER On 20.03.2024, this court had passed an order that the husband by next date of hearing shall deposit all the pending arrears and no further time will be granted. On that interim order granted earlier was extended till the next date of hearing. When the matter came up on 23.06.2025, learned counsel appearing for the wife is present and there is no representation on behalf of the learned counsel for the husband. Then the writ petition filed by the husband is directed to be listed for dismissal today. Today also there is no representation on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner/husband. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21908 WP No. 27630 of 2023 Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE TS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3.1