IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.18322 of 2025 Decided on: 1st December, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Aryan …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajat Choudhry, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Rajat Choudhry, learned Assistant Advocate General and Mr. Vikrant Thakur, learned Standing Counsel, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 & 2 and respondent No.3, respectively. 2. This writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive prayers:- “(i) That the respondent may very kindly be directed to re- check the answer of question No.87 in Series ‘D’ and respondent may very kindly be directed to revise the 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 final result (P-6) of the Police Constable recruitment process qua the Petitioner. (ii) That respondent department may kindly be directed to re-conduct the written examination.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievances raised by the petitioner in this writ petition have already been redressed by respondent No.3-H.P. Public Service Commission, on the basis of which, Anmol Kumar Versus State of H.P. and others2 was decided. In view of above, the present writ petition to stand disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua December 01, 2025 Judge Mukesh 2 CWP No.17964 of 2025, decided on 25.11.2025