Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34826 (PNJ)

DINESHWAR SINGH @ DINESH SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR

CRM-M/14670/2025 · 2025-04-28

Harpreet Singh Brar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

124 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DINESHWAR SINGH @ DINESH SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON’BLE MR. Present: Mr. Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. A.G., Punjab. HARPREET SINGH BRAR 1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 is for quashing of FIR bearing No.0093 dated under Section 117(2), 115(2), 3(5) of BNS, 2023 at Police Station Sadar Pathankot, District Pathankot. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition and seeks liberty to raise all the pleas taken in th the appropriate stage, during the course of trial and confines his prayer to the extent that petitioner trial on each and every date would cause great inconvenience and hardshi him as it would compel him to travel a long distance to appear before the trial Court. 3. The instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn prayed for. However, in IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DINESHWAR SINGH @ DINESH SINGH V/S PUNJAB AND ANOTHER HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Mr. Munish Puri, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. A.G., Punjab. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 is for quashing of FIR bearing No.0093 dated under Section 117(2), 115(2), 3(5) of BNS, 2023 at Police Station Sadar Pathankot, District Pathankot. Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present seeks liberty to raise all the pleas taken in th the appropriate stage, during the course of trial and confines his prayer to the extent that petitioner is serving as Nayak in the Indian Army and trial on each and every date would cause great inconvenience and hardshi him as it would compel him to travel a long distance to appear before the trial The instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn . However, in view of the ratio laid down by this C IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-14670-2025 Date of decision: 28.04.2025 ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENTS HARPREET SINGH BRAR Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. A.G., Punjab. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 is for quashing of FIR bearing No.0093 dated 25.08.2024 registered under Section 117(2), 115(2), 3(5) of BNS, 2023 at Police Station Sadar Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present seeks liberty to raise all the pleas taken in the present petition, at the appropriate stage, during the course of trial and confines his prayer to the is serving as Nayak in the Indian Army and attending the trial on each and every date would cause great inconvenience and hardship to him as it would compel him to travel a long distance to appear before the trial The instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as of the ratio laid down by this Court in CRM-M- MANISHA 2025.04.29 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment CRM-M-14670 25963-2023 titled as and another’ 2023 (2) Law Herald 1498, petitioner before the learned trial Court is ordered to be exempted, subject to the following conditions: i) ii) iii) iv) v) vi) April 28, 2025 manisha (i) (ii) 14670-2025 titled as ‘Suresh Kumar and another Vs. The State of Haryana ’ 2023 (2) Law Herald 1498, the personal appearance of the petitioner before the learned trial Court is ordered to be exempted, subject to llowing conditions:- petitioner shall be represented through shall not delay/stall the trial proceedings; shall not dispute his identity as accused; shall have no objection if the prosecution evidence is recorded in his absence but in the presence of counsel; shall appear before the trial Court as and when required; and any other condition, which the trial Court may impose. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable -2- Suresh Kumar and another Vs. The State of Haryana the personal appearance of the petitioner before the learned trial Court is ordered to be exempted, subject to petitioner shall be represented through his counsel; shall not delay/stall the trial proceedings; identity as accused; shall have no objection if the prosecution evidence is absence but in the presence of his shall appear before the trial Court as and when required; any other condition, which the trial Court may impose. HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No MANISHA 2025.04.29 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment