Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
DL.24 08-08-2025 Ct. No.446 Saikat CRM (A)/2727/2025
JIBAN ROY AND ANR. VS.
STATE OF WEST BENGAL
In Re: Application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita filed in connection with Balurghat P.S. Case No.941/2024 dated 22.11.2024 under Sections 126(2)/351(2)/132/303(2)/3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,
2023.
Md. Bani Israil, Adv.
…For the Petitioners
Mr. Avishek Sinha, Adv.
Ms. Pallavi Priyadarshee, Adv. …For the State
1. Heard the submission made by the learned counsels appearing on behalf of both the parties.
2. After careful perusal of the materials on record and considering the nature of allegation levelled and the facts and circumstances that the investigation is still going on and certain incriminating material is found, therefore, at this stage, this Court is not inclined to grant the prayer for pre-arrest bail of the petitioners.
3. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.
[Chaitali Chatterjee (Das), J.]