1 2025:CGHC:32833-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2209 of 2025 Aarti Sharma W/o Shri Rajesh Sharma Aged About 34 Years R/o Baba Ramdev Ward No. - 11, Bemetara, District- Bemetara (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station - Bemetara, District- Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Sushila Sharma W/o Shri Omprakash Sharma Aged About 50 Years R/o Ward No. - 11, Bemetara, P.S. Bemetara, District- Bemetara (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Abhyuday Tripathi, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Hariom Rai, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 15.07.2025 1. Heard Mr. Abhyuday Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Hariom Rai, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State/respondent No.1. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- ANURADHA TIWARI Digitally signed by ANURADHA TIWARI Date: 2025.07.16 10:28:44 +0530 2 “It is therefore prayed that the Hon’ble Court may be kind enough to allow the petition and to quash/set-aside the impugned FIR No.103/2021 dated 09/02/2021 [Annexure P/1], and impugned Chargesheet/Final Report dated 01/06/2022 registered/filled against the petitioner [Annexure P/2], and also order dated 04/06/2022 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bemetara, District Bemetara whereby cognizance has been taken and case was registered as Criminal Case 893/2022 [Annexure P/3], in the interest of justice.” 3. On perusal of the prayer in the present petition, it transpires that the present petition is drafted with the prayers which are defective as there is no mention of the offences under which the FIR has been registered, therefore, we are not inclined to entertain the present petition with such a vague and sketchy prayer, to which learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to file afresh petition with proper prayer. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection. 5. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the 3 petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for subject to depositing a sum of Rs.2,000/- for filing such a petition in a casual manner and thereby wasting the precious time of this Court, as cost by the petitioner in the Registry of this Court and submit a receipt of the same at the time of filing of the fresh petition, if any and the amount so deposited, if any shall be transmitted to the Government SAA Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. 6. Certified copy of the impugned FIR as well as charge-sheet as also the other documents may be returned back to the petitioner after retaining photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Anu