Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34813 (KAR)

BABU v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/13090/2023 · 2025-06-18

J M Khazi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21087 CRL.P No. 13090 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13090 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. BABU S/O LATE SRIRAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS 2. DEVARAJU S/O PEDDA MALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 3. LOKESHA S/O DEVARAJU, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS 4. SHANKARAPPA S/O LATE MALLEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 5. PEDDA MALLAPPA S/O LATE LAKSHMAN, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 6. SHAMALA W/O DEVARAJU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21087 CRL.P No. 13090 of 2023 7. SHANTHAMMA W/O LATE SRIRAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 8. SARASWATHI W/O SHANKARAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 9. CHANDRAKALA W/O RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS PETITIONER NOS.1 TO 9 ARE R/AT GOWNIVARAPALLI VILLAGE, BEGAPALLI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-563124 10. NAGARAJU S/O LATE MALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT BUDIDAGADDAPALLI VILLAGE, BEGAPALLI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-563124 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. HARISH H V, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY CHELUR P S, NOW REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT COMPLEX, BENGALURU-01 - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21087 CRL.P No. 13090 of 2023 2. THE TALUK EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-563124 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.VENKAT SATYANARAYAN.A, HCGP) THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH IN M.A.G.C.R/29/2023-24 ON THE FILE OF CHELUR P.S., PENDING BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT / THE TALUK EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT AND FURTHER THEREBY ALLOWING THE ABOVE CRIMINAL PETITION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for petitioner filed memo seeking further time to take steps. Prayer rejected. Vide order dated 10.06.2025, a conditional order was passed to the effect that if office objections are not complied with, necessary orders would be passed. Despite office objections are not complied with. Hence, petition is dismissed for default. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE RR/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18