Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34812 (PNJ)

RAM CHANDER SHARMA AND ANOTHER v. R.S. DHILLON, IAS

COCP/1113/2024 · 2025-03-26

Harkesh Manuja

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

134 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA RAM CHANDER SHARMA AND AN R.S. DHILLON, IAS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Ms Mr. Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Harya HARKESH MANUJA Learned State counsel representing the respondents informs that the order passed by the Writ Court has been Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP (Civil) Diary Nos.44346/2024. In view of the above, learned does not press the present petition at this stage, however, with liberty to seek revival of the present petition, subject to final outcome of the Dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. Rule stands dischar 26.03.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: RAM CHANDER SHARMA AND ANOTHER Versus R.S. DHILLON, IAS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Ms. Kuldeep Kaur, Advocate for Mr. S.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate for the Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Harya **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel representing the respondents informs that the order passed by the Writ Court has been Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP (Civil) Diary Nos.44346/2024. In view of the above, learned does not press the present petition at this stage, however, with liberty to seek revival of the present petition, subject to final outcome of the Dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. Rule stands discharged. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1113-2024 Date of Decision: March 26, 2025 OTHER ........Petitioners ........Respondent HARKESH MANUJA Kuldeep Kaur, Advocate for Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana. Learned State counsel representing the respondents informs that the order passed by the Writ Court has been stayed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP (Civil) Diary Nos.44346/2024. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the present petition at this stage, however, with liberty to seek revival of the present petition, subject to final outcome of the SLP. Dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No 2024 March 26, 2025 Learned State counsel representing the respondents stayed by the s does not press the present petition at this stage, however, with liberty to TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.03.26 19:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document