Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3481 (PAT)

Rajendra Singh v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./78480/2025 · 2026-02-20

Chandra Shekhar Jha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78480 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-273 Year-2025 Thana- AKHODHIGOLA District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1. Rajendra Singh S/o Late Jhagru Singh @ Late Jhagadu Singh R/o Village- Supabigha, PS- Akorhigola, Dist- Rohtas. 2. Lallan Singh S/o Late Ramdeo Singh R/o Village- Supabigha, PS- Akorhigola, Dist- Rohtas. 3. Vijendra Singh @ Bijendra Kumar @ Vijendra Kumar S/o Rambali Singh R/o vill - Jaynagar, P.S.- Akorhigola, Distt.- Rohtas. 4. Ram Dayal Mahto @ Surendra Singh S/o Late Bishun Mahto R/o vill - Gobardhanpur, P.S.- Akorhigola, Distt.- Rohtas. 5. Hemant Singh @ Hemant Kumar S/o Ram Bachan Singh R/o village - Jay Nagar, P.S.- Akorhigola, Distt.- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .. ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Babu Nandan Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 4 20-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The accused/petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Akorhigola P.S. Case No. 273 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 109 of BNS, 2023. 3. The allegation against the petitioners is to assault informant and others by using lathi, rod, farsa etc. and causing such head and bodily injuries, which may likely to cause death of the injured. The Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78480 of 2025(4) dt.20-02-2026 2/3 occurrence alleged to be arising out of land dispute. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that occurrence took place due to land dispute. It is further submitted that the allegation qua physical assault is appearing very much general and omnibus against petitioners except petitioner no. 4, namely, Ram Dayal Mahto, who alleged to assault injured Ram Sakal Mahto but upon medical examination of said injured, the nature of injury was found simple in nature, negating prima facie intention to cause death. Explaining criminal antecedent, it is submitted that petitioner nos. 1 and 3 found involved in one more criminal case, where they are on bail whereas petitioner nos. 2, 4 and 5 are of clean antecedents. 5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail. 6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by taking note of fact as allegation qua physical assault appears very much general and omnibus against petitioners, coupled with the fact that nature of injuries upon medical examination also found simple in nature, accordingly, all five above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial Court, within a period of four weeks of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78480 of 2025(4) dt.20-02-2026 3/3 order, is directed to be released on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Dehri, Rohtas/concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection with Akorhigola P.S. Case No. 273 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. veena/- (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) U T