- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4675 WP No. 106080 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 106080 OF 2016 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: MATHOSHREE GURUSANGAMMA MUKKANNAPPA KORI VIDYAVARDHAKA SANGHA, (M.G.M.K.V.V. ASSOCIATION’S), TALIKOTI-586 214, MUDDEBIHAL, VIJAYAPURA DISTRICT. REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, SHRI. SOMSHEKHAR S/O MANOHAR KORI, AGE: 43, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O LAKAMANAHALLI, TQ AND DIST: DHARWAD. …PETITIONER [ABSENT] AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU. REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY. 2. THE HOUSING COMMISSIONER, KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, 3RD AND 4TH FLOOR, CUAVERY BHAVAN-560 009, BENGALURU. 3. KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, HUBBALLI, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4675 WP No. 106080 of 2016 REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, SUB-DIVISION, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT PLANNING OFFICER, HUBBALLI. 4. THE KARNATAKA RAJYA BANAJIGA SAMAJADA KSHEMABHIRUDHI SANGHA (R), BENGALURU, KENDRIYA KACHERI, VARKAR ONI, KOPPAL-583 231, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT. 5. THE COMMISSIONER, THE HUBBALLI-DHARWAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DHARWAD. 6. AKSHARA IGNOU COMMUNITY COLLEGE, OPPOSITE DENA BANK, JUBILEE CIRCLE, DHARWAD-580 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA.R.PATIL., HCGP FOR R1; SMT. SHARMILA.M.PATIL., ADVOCATE FOR R2-3; SRI. RAJASHEKAR.R.GUNJALLI., ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI. BHUSHAN.B.KULKARNI., ADVOCATE FOR R5; R6-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4675 WP No. 106080 of 2016 ORAL ORDER The petition is listed today for Preliminary Hearing B- Group and the name of the petitioner is printed/ shown in the cause list. The name of the petitioner is called out thrice in the open Court, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. The petitioner is absent. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 06.03.2025, on that day, counsel Smt.Surabhi Kulkarni., was permitted to retire from the case and the office was directed to print the name of the petitioner in the cause list and it was also ordered to be listed on 12.03.2025. Accordingly, the petition is listed today by printing the name of the petitioner in the cause list. As could be seen from the writ papers, the petition is filed in 2016. Now we are in the month of March 2025. The petition is pending from nine years. As already noted above, the name of the petitioner is called out thrice in the open Court, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. The petitioner has not engaged counsel to represent her in the Court. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4675 WP No. 106080 of 2016 prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 44.1