Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:HHC:39497
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Cr.MMO No. 1124 of 2025
Decided on: 21st November, 2025 ___________________________________________________________ Farook Mohammed
....Petitioner Versus
Asha
…..Respondent
Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge
1 Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate.
For the respondent: None
Ranjan Sharma, Judge (Oral)
After hearing for some time, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the orders passed by the Court below as the amount of interim maintenance of Rs.3,000/- is fair, just and appropriate in facts and circumstances of the case.
2.
Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate appearing for the petitioner, on Instructions, states that petitioner does not
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2025:HHC:39497 2 intend to continue with the present proceedings hereinafter (statement taken on record).
3.
Taking into account the prayer made by Learned Counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition, is dismissed as withdrawn, based on the statement, as aforesaid.
In aforesaid terms, the instant petition as well as all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(Ranjan Sharma)
Judge 21st November, 2025 (mamta)