Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34808 (AP)

PAGADALA SRINIVASULU v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/28228/2025 · 2025-10-14

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010542942025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 28228/2025 Between: 1. PAGADALA SRINIVASULU, S/O VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC ADVOCATE, R/O DOOR.NO.3-47, RAMALAYAM STREET, RAYAVARAM VILLAGE, T. SUNDUPALLE MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF STAMPS AND REGISTRATION SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. 2. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, RAYACHOTY, ERSTWHILE YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. 3. THE SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE, RAYACHOTY, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not consider the petitioners representation dated 25-04-2025 as per Circular Memo. No. G1/1843/2015 dated 08.04.2015, is as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Principles of natural justice and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to consider petitioners representation dated 25-04-2025 as per Circular Memo. No. G1/1843/2015 dated 08.04.2015, in connection with sale deed vide document bearing No.4268 of 2022 dated 28-03-2022 before Rayachoti SRO, pertaining Petitioners property, which was registered with fraudulent manner by making false statements, delivering false copies and evidences, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2ND respondent to consider petitioner's representation dated 25-04- 2025 as per Circular Memo. No. G1/1843/2015 dated 08.04.2015, in connection with Sale deecTvide^loCUment bearing No:4268 T)f 2022 dated 28-03-2022 before Rayachoti SRO, pertaining Petitioner's property, which was registered with fraudulent manner by making false statements, delivering false copies and evidences, pending disposal of the main Writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHAKRAVARTHY P V S K Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.28228 of 2025 ORDER:- Sri P.V.S.K. Chakravarthy, learned counsel for petitioner sought permission of this Court for withdrawal of the writ petition. Learned counsel endorsed the same on bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 15.10.2025 TVN 175 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.28228 OF 2025 Date: 15.10.2025 TVN