1 2025:CGHC:34766-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3811 of 2025 Anirudh Gupta S/o Jamuna Prasad Gupta Aged About 53 Years Residing At House Number 765 Ward Number 06 Behind Birji Dhaba Near Dhimarpur Square, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of Tribal And Scheduled Caste Development, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh. 2. Commissioner, Tribal and Scheduled Caste Development, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar Chhattisgarh. 3. Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 4. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development Department, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ...Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Arjit Tiwari, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Mr. Shashank Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.07.22 18:45:04 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 22.07.2025 1. Heard Mr. Arjit Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Shashank Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General, appearing for the State. 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: “i. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the present writ petition. ii. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order, directing the respondents to release and disburse the amount of Rs. 7,37,250/- to the petitioner forthwith, as per the communication dated 24.08.2023 & 05.07.2024; iii. That, the Hon’ble Court may award interest @ 12% per annum on the said amount from the date of execution of work till actual realization; iv. Award costs of the present petition in favour of the petitioner; 3 v. Pass such other and further orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case, in the interest of justice.” 3. After arguing the matter at length, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission from this Court to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to approach the appropriate Forum for redressal of his grievances. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection. 5. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan