2025:HHC:39496 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 18065 of 2025 Decided on: 21st November, 2025 ___________________________________________________________ Aman Yadav ....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …..Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1 Whether approved for reporting? No For the petitioners: Mr. Parveen Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Ranjana Patial, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents- State. Ranjan Sharma, Judge (Oral) Mr. Parveen Sharma, Advocate, appearing vice Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner, on Instructions, states that due to subsequent events, petitioner does not intend to continue with the present proceedings hereinafter (Statement Taken on Record). 2. Prayer for giving closure to withdrawal of instant 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2025:HHC:39496 ) 2 petition, being innocuous is not opposed by Learned Counsel for the respondents-State also. 3. Taking into account the prayer made by Learned Counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition, is disposed of as infructuous. In aforesaid terms, the instant writ petition as well as all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge 21st November, 2025 (mamta)