201 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1756-2000 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 06, 2025 Pirthi Chand … Appellant Versus The Execu ve Officer and another …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- None for the appellant. Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) In compliance of the previous order, no ce was sent at the address of the appellant to be served upon his family members/legal heirs. As per report received from the Registry, the sole appellant – Pirthi Chand le- behind 06 children. Two of the sons, namely, Jograj Kumar and Gabinder Kumar have since died; three daughters, namely, Rani, Saroj Rani and Neeta Rani are married and are residing with their in-laws. Another son, namely, Rajinder Kumar accepted the no ce. Thus, one of the LRs of deceased-appellant has received the no ce. S ll, neither he nor any other LRs of deceased-appellant has come forward to pursue the appeal. It appears that the appellant/his LRs are no longer interested in pursuing this appeal. Dismissed in default for want of prosecu on. February 06, 2025 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Sarita Rani 2025.02.06 17:24 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order