RAMESHWAR BABURAO GAIKWAD v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRARA
CP/963/2023 · 2025-08-06
Shri N B Suryawanshi, Shri Sandipkumar C More
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34801 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34801 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(1) 926- C. P. No. 963-2023.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 963 OF 2023 IN WP/12203/2022 RAMESHWAR BABURAO GAIKWAD VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRARA ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. D. A. Jayabhar h/f Shubham Dattatrya Jayabhar AGP for Respondent/State: Mrs. S. N. Deshmukh Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : R. B. Deshpande ...
CORAM :
NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.
DATED : 06th AUGUST, 2025
ORDER:-
1. Learned Advocate for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4 has placed on record the decision of Executive Engineer dated 01.08.2025 by which the claim of the petitioner for rental compensation is rejected. According to him, by this order, the direction of this Court is complied with.
2. Learned Advocate for the petitioner does not dispute the said position. He states that he intends to challenge the said order.
3. In view of compliance of order, the Contempt Petition is
disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the impugned
order.
(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ) JUDGE JUDGE Y.S. Kulkarni