Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
SHIMLA
CWP No. 5264/2020
Decided on: 19.11.2025
Sri Ram
…Petitioner
Versus
CSKHPKV & Anr.
.…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner:
Mr. Bonit Parkash, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Advocate
for respondent No.1.
Mr. Rangil Singh, Advocate, vice
Mr. Tara Chand Chauhan,
Advocate for respondent No.2.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J
CMP No.27504/2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and disposed of.
CWP No. 5264/2020
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage.
2.
This writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive relief: -
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
2
“That the entire service rendered by the petitioner w.e.f. the date of his appointment on ad-hoc basis may be held to qualify for the purpose of pension and GPF number may be ordered to be allotted to the petitioner and the petitioner may be held to be entitled to pension under the Old Pension Rules, 1972.”
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issue involved in this writ petition, grievance of the petitioner and the relief prayed for have essentially been adjudicated upon in Paras Ram Versus State of H.P. & Anr.2. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner would be content in case the respondents are directed to examine the case in light of the aforesaid
judgment within a fixed time schedule. Learned counsel for the respondents are not averse to this prayer.
4.
Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the case of the petitioner in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment by passing appropriate orders, within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand
disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge 19th November, 2025(rohit)
2 CWP No. 8771/2010, decided on 11.11.2011