Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34796 (RAJ)

JITENDRA S/O SHRI FORAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15910/2024 · 2025-02-04

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:4848] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15910/2024 1. Jitendra S/o Shri Foran Singh, R/o Babarpur, Police Station Rajakheda, District Dholpur, (Raj.) (At Present In District Jail, Dholpur). 2. Ramraj @ Chaukhai S/o Shri Gopal Singh, R/o Babarpur, Police Station Rajakheda, District Dholpur, (Raj.) (At Present In District Jail, Dholpur). 3. Subhash S/o Shri Ratan Singh, R/o Babarpur, Police Station Rajakheda, District Dholpur, (Raj.) (At Present In District Jail, Dholpur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Jain Mr. Udit Sapra For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Govind Upadhyay HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 04/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS., on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.353/2024 registered at Police Station Rajakheda, District Dholpur for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 303(2), 351(2) & 352 of BNS. Later on, police filed charge-sheet in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 352, 3(5) & 110 of BNS. [2025:RJ-JP:4848] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15910/2024] 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that none of the injuries sustained to injured person has been opined as dangerous to life. Petitioners are in custody since 30.11.2024 & there are no criminal antecedents against them. Charge-sheet has been filed & trial of the case will take considerable time. Further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for complainant vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by both the parties, as also considering the nature of injuries; charge-sheet has been filed & trial will take time in its conclusion; absence of criminal antecedent as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners – 1) Jitendra S/o Shri Foran Singh, 2) Ramraj @ Chaukhai S/o Shri Gopal Singh & 3) Subhash S/o Shri Ratan Singh shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they [2025:RJ-JP:4848] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15910/2024] shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /347