Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34793 (CHH)

ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA v. RAJKUMAR GUPTA

WP227/616/2022 · 2025-03-18

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- 2025:CGHC:12792 NAFR HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 616 of 2022 Ashok Kumar Gupta, S/o Late Haridas Gupta, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Haldibadi, Chirmiri, District Koriya, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - Rajkumar Gupta, S/o Late Haridas Gupta, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Dutta Colony, In Front of P G College, Ambikapur City, District Surguja Chhattisgarh. 2 - Arvind Kumar Gupta S/o Late Haridas Gupta Aged About 45 Years R/o Haldibadi, Chirmiri, P.S. Bada Bazzar, Tahsil Khadagwaan, Chirmiri, District Korea Chhattisgarh. 3 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Surguja Ambikapur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Lalmani Devi W/o Shri Raj Kumar Agrahari Aged About 55 Years R/o Ward No. 12, N P C C, Colony, Jayant Singhroli, Gopath Banas, District Sighroli Madhya Pradesh. 5 - Smt. Saroj W/o Shri Ajay Kumar Aged About 50 Years R/o Rani Bagh, Near Imaam Square, Post And City Mirzapur, Mahuariya, District Mirzapur Uttar Pradesh (Uttar Pradesh). 6 - Smt. Anuradha Gupta, W/o Shri Sunil Kumar Gupta Aged About 43 Years D/o Haridas Gupta, R/o Sadar Muhaal, Gopiganj, Gopiganj Sant Ravidas Nagar, District Sant Ravidas Nagar Uttar Pradesh. Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE -2- 7 - Dr. Mrs. Nitu Singh, W/o Dr. Kumar Nishant Singh Aged About 43 Years R/o Near Chiniya Mod Gadhva, P.S. Gadhva,, District : Garhwa *, Jharkhand. 8 - Mrs Priya Gupta W/o Shri Gaurav Narayan Agrawal Aged About 40 Years Caste Rouniyar, R/o Nawatoli, Daltenganj, Shri Narayan Multi City Hospital, Daltanganj, Medni Nagar, Palamu, District : Palamu, Jharkhand. ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Hemant Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Ravindra Sharma, Advocate For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Vaibhav A. Goverdhan, Advocate For Respondent No.3/State : Mr. Prateek Tiwari, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 18.03.2025 1) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would seek permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to take recourse to law. 2) Not opposed by the other side. 3) Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as stated above. 4) Certified copy, if any, be returned after retaining its xerox copy. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nadim