216 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1609-2000 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 28, 2025 Municipal Commi1ee, Kaithal … Appellant Versus Jai Bhagwan (Died) through LRs …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- None for the appellant. Mr. A.P. Bhandari, Advocate for the respondents. Mr. Lalit Singla, Advocate for Parveen Kumar, son of deceased-respondent – Jai Bhagwan. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) No'ce issued to the appellant has been duly served through its Clerk, as reported by the Registry, but there is no representa'on on its behalf. It appears that appellant is no longer interested in pursuing this appeal. Dismissed in default for want of prosecu'on. January 28, 2025 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Sarita Rani 2025.01.29 10:13 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order