APHC010542652024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4491/2024 Between: 1. S. MANOHAR, S/O S. NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O SADDIKUTIVARIPALLE H/O MUDIVEDU, KURABALAKOTA MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. P LAKSHMI NARASIMHAM IAS, THE COMMISSIONER OF APPEALS, O/O CHIEF COMMISSIONER, LAND ADMINISTRATION, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT (R2) 2. SRIDHAR CHERUKURI I A S, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT , RAYACHOTY (R3) 3. MEGHA SWAROOP, SUB COLLECTOR, MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT (R5) 4. THAPASWINI, TAHSILDAR, KURABALAKOTA MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT (R6) ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 2 1. VENKATA SAI KRISHNA PONNURU The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri P. Anand Surya, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava, learned Counsel for the Contempt Petitioner and Sri Venkata Sai Krishna Ponnuru, learned Counsel for the Respondents. 2. Sri P. Anand Surya, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava, learned Counsel for the Contempt Petitioner submits that the Interim Order of this Court, dated 21.10.2024 has been complied with by passing a Speaking Order on 30.01.2025. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner would submit that no further enquiry is required, and he seeks liberty to challenge the said Order passed by the Respondents, dated 30.01.2025. 3. In this view of the matter, this Contempt Case is closed. 4. Needless to stated that the Petitioners are always at liberty to challenge the said Order, if they so aggrieved. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 07.03.2025 DSV