- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2493 RFA No. 2327 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2327 OF 2023 (SP) BETWEEN: RAMAKRISHNA S/O LATE MATEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, RESIDING AT GUDDENAHALLI, J.H.KERE POST, KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573 201. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SHARATH., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. CHETHAN.B., ADVOCATE) AND: BASAVARAJU.T S/O LATE THOPEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT GAVENALLI VILLAGE, GAVENALLI POST, HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573 201. …RESPONDENT THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDER, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Sharath., counsel on behalf of Sri.Chethan.B., for the appellant has appeared in person and submits that short Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2493 RFA No. 2327 of 2023 accommodation may be granted to comply with the office objections. This Court is not inclined to grant time. The reason is simple. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed before the Registrar (P & H) and time was granted to comply with the office objections. Thereafter, the appeal was listed before the Court on 10.01.2025, on that day, finally, two week's time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the appeal was ordered to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections' on 21.01.2025. The appeal is listed today under the caption 'for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections'. Despite granting sufficient time, the office objections are not complied with. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 64