APHC010543432007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 20761/2007 Between: 1. B.VENKATESWARA REDDY, KURNOOL., S/O.B.VENKATA REDDY R/O.HG.NO.40-814-7B, SRINIVASA NAGAR, KURNOOL 518 004. ...PETITIONER AND 1. P O LABOUR COURT VSP 3 OTHERS, VISAKHAPATNAM, REP. BY ITS PRESIDING OFFICER. 2. THE MANAGER EXPRESS PUBLICATIONS MADURAI, LIMITED, 30- 21-40, MADHAVADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE REGIONAL MANAGER EXPRESS PUBLICATIONS MADURAI, LIMITED, PLOT NO.2, D.NO.6-3-1186, BEGUMPET, HYDERABAD - 500 016. 4. EXPRESS PUBLICATIONS MADURAI LIMITED REP BY ITS, CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR, SRI MANOJ KUMAR SANTHALIA, MOUNT ROAD CHENNAI - 600 00. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records in I.D.No.94/2004 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the Award dt. 5-6-2007 published in G.O.Rt.No.1796 dt. 4-8-2007 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 herein to reinstate the petitioner into service, and to grant such other relief or reliefs. IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 26910 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 herein not to take any steps to recover the amount which are received by the petitioner towards the EPF benefits, by suspending the Award passed by the 1st respondent in IO D.No.94/2004 on the file of the 1st respondent, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and to pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHILAMKURI HANUMANTHA RAYUDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LABOUR 2. DARSI BALA RAJU 3. S RAVINDRANATH The Court made the following: ORDER Despite listing the matter under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR