Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34778 (KAR)

SRI G S NARAYANAMURTHY v. SMT ANUSUYAMMA

WP/29601/2024 · 2025-02-04

H T Narendra Prasad

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:4928 WP No. 29601 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 29601 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI G S NARAYANAMURTHY S/O LATE SRINIVASAPPA OCC AGRICULTURIST AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS R/O SIDDANAMATA VILLAGE CHANNAGIRI TALUK DAVANGERE DISTRICT-577213. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ARAVIND H.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT ANUSUYAMMA W/O LAXMANA AGE ABOUT 67 YEARS OCC HOME MAKER R/O DEVARAHALLI VILLAGE CHANNAGIRI TALUK DAVANGERE DISTRICT. 577213. 2. SMT. KARIYAMMA @ KAMALAMMA W/O HANUMANTHAPPA B.T AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS OCC AGRICULTURIST R/O GODABANAHALU VILLAGE CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577555. 3. SRI. GIRISH S/O SHREERANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS OCC AGRICULTURIST R/O GOPANAHALU VILLAGE Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:4928 WP No. 29601 of 2024 CHANNAGIRI TALUK DAVANGERE DISTRICT. 577522 4. N. PAVITHRA D/O LATE NARASIMHAPPA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS HOUSE WIFE R/O CHANNAPPA BADAVANE WARD NO.6, HOLALKERE TOWN & TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577526. 5. N. GOWTHAMI D/O LATE NARASIMHAPPA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS HOUSE WIFE R/O CHANNAPPA BADAVANE WARD NO.6, HOLALKERE TOWN & TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577526 …RESPONDENTS (NOTICE TO R2 TO R5 IS D/W V/O DATED:06.11.2024) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUION ON INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED: 24.10.2024 ON I.A.NO. V PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC CHANNAGIRI IN O.S.NO. 116/2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-E & DECLARE THAT THE ORDER PASSED ON I.A.NO.V IS WITHOUT VERIFYING THE FACTS AND ILLEGAL AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:4928 WP No. 29601 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner appearing through video conference submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition and he would file a memo to that effect in that Registry. 2. The submission of the learned counsel is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE DM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36