Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.20460 of 2025
Decided on: 24.12.2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Radha Kumari
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and Anr
.....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Rocky, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, Assistant Advocate General.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sushil Kukreja Judge (Oral)
Notice. Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, learned Assistant Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2.
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage.
3.
Petitioner’s grievance is that her representation dated 10.11.2025, (Annexure P-3), seeking applicability of CWP No. 1638 of 2024, titled Mohit Sharma & Anr. Versus State of H.P. & Ors., decided on 29.11.2024
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2 (Annexure P-2) has not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Assistant Advocate General is not averse to this prayer.
4.
Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in the case of Mohit Sharma (Supra) within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner.
The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
(Sushil Kukreja) December 24, 2025
Judge R.Atal