( 2025:JHHC:13607 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3548 of 2025 ------ Dada @ Motu @ Malka @ Rajendra Mandal, aged about 41 years, Son of Jagdeo Mandal, Resident of Village –Charak, P.O. & P.S. –Tundi, Dist. –Dhanbad. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Kamdeo Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Kr. Keshri, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 05.05.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with S.T. Case No. 456 of 2024 arising out of Birni P.S. Case No.184 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under sections 395/400 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed dacoity and looted the jewelries of the informant. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 22.03.2024, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 14 of the bail application. It is then submitted that without putting the petitioner on Test Identification Parade, as mentioned in para-3 of the supplementary affidavit dated 22.04.2025, charge sheet has been submitted against him. It is next submitted that no witnesses have been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Giridih, in connection with S.T. Case No. 456 of 2024 arising out of Birni P.S. Case No.184 of 2023 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu-Gunjan/