MITHILESH ALIAS AKHILESH ALIAS AKHLESH KORWA v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./9076/2025 · 2025-10-06
Ambuj Nath
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34771 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34771 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:30708 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B. A. No. 9076 of 2025
1. Mithilesh @ Akhilesh @ Akhlesh Korwa, aged about 28 years, son of
Jitan Korwa, resident of Village- Chunchuna Panchpheri, P.O. &
P.S.- Samripath, District- Balrampur, Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh.
2. Amarjit @ Kali @ Sani Brijiya, aged about 19 years, son of Balram
Brijiya, resident of Village- Pundag, P.O. & P.S.- Samripath, District-
Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh.
…. Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand
…. Opp. Party
------ CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH
------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Vishnu Prabhakar Pathak, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, A.P.P.
----- 2/ 06.10.2025 Heard the parties.
2.
Petitioners have been made accused in connection with S.T. No. 140 of 2025, arising out of Chhipadohar P.S. Case No.14 of 2020, corresponding to G.R. Case No.577 of 2025, for the offences registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 353, 387 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Latehar.
3.
On 01.04.2020, Chhipadohar police on the basis of confidential information that some ultras had assembled in Ramandag forest area rushed to the place of occurrence. On seeing the police party, the ultras started firing on them. There was exchange of fire between both the sides, being overpowered, the ultras fled away.
4.
It was submitted that though the petitioners are named in the F.I.R., but their names have transpired on the basis of confidential information. It was further submitted that co-accused Bimal Singh @ Kishor Jee and co- accused persons have been granted bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court as well as by this Court and the case of the petitioners stand on similar footing.
5.
In view of the submission made above, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Latehar, in connection with S.T. No. 140 of 2025, arising out of Chhipadohar P.S. Case No.14 of 2020, corresponding to G.R. Case No.577 of 2025.
(Ambuj Nath, J.) R.Kr.