IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2443 of 2025 Date of Decision: 08.12.2025 _______________________________________________________ Chaman Lal & Ors. …….Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Rahul Singh Jagota, proxy counsel. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record communication dated 06.12.2025, issued under the signatures of Director, School Education, Himachal Pradesh, enclosing therewith copy of office order dated 06.12.2025 passed by Dy. Director School Education (Ele.), Chamba, District Chamba, Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, stands complied with. 2. Having carefully perused aforesaid documents, which are taken on record, this Court finds that respondents, after having considered the case of the petitioners, in light of Ranjit Singh’s case 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 judgment, are not found similar situate to the Ranjit Singh, as such, have not entitled to the benefit of FR22(1) (a) (1). 2. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, the same is disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law, laying therein challenge to afore order passed in purported compliance of the judgment, sought to be executed. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge December 08, 2025 (sunil)