Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3477 (AP)

YAMAKA SALMON PRABHAKAR, W.G.DISTRICT. v. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, W.G.DISTRICT.

WP/20092/2002 · 2025-07-06

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010017282002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 20092/2002 Between: 1. YAMAKA SALMON PRABHAKAR, W.G.DISTRICT., S/O. Y. DAVID RAJU, SECONDARY GRADE TEACHER, LUTHERAN AIDED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, PANDUGUDEM, W.G.DISTRICT. 2. PATHALA VIJAYA RAJENDRA PRASAD,, S/O. P.VIJAYA RAO, SECONDARY GRADE TEACHER, LUTHERAN AIDED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, K.P.PURAM, W.G.DISTRICT. 3. GANGULURI RAJASEKHAR,, S/O. SARABANDU, SECONDARY GRADE TEACHER, LUTHERAN AIDED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, YERRAIGUDEM, W.G.DISTRICT. 4. TALARI SUNEETA,, D/O. T.GANGA RAJU, SECONDARY GRADE TEACHER, LUTHERAN AIDED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, MUPPINAVARIGUDEM, W.G.DISTRICT. 5. PENKU RATNA VINAYA,, D/O. P.DEVADA, SECONDARY GRADE TEACHER, LUTHERAN AIDED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, MUPPINAVARIGUDEM, W.G.DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER W G DISTRICT, ELURU, W.G.DISTRICT. 2. THE MANDAL EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, BUTTAIGUDEM, W.G.DISTRICT. 3. THE CORRESPONDNET, LUTHERAN AIDED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, BUTTAIGUDEM, W.G.DISTRICT. 4. THE HEADMASTER, LUTHERAN AIDED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, K.KANNAPURAM, W.G.DISTRICT. 5. THE HEADMASTER, LUTHERAN AIDED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, PANDUGUDEM, W.G.DISTRICT. 6. THE HEADMASTER, LUTHERAN AIDED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, YERRAIGUDEM, W.G.DISTRICT. 7. THE HEADMASTER, LUTHERAN AIDED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, MUPPINAVARIGUDEM, W.G.DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus or otherwise declaring the action of the respondents in not paying salary to the petitioners and not approving the petitioners appiointment as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional violating Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and issue consequential directions directing the respondents to forthwith pay salary to the petitioners and further direct the respondents to approve the approve the appointments of the petitioners and pay salary regulary, in the interest of justice, as otherwise, the petitioners will be put to irreparable loss and injury and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 25199 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay salary to the petitioners forthwith pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P V KRISHNAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri P.V.Krishnaiah, learned counsel for the petitioner appeared through virtual mode and submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 07th July, 2025 RKS